September 18, 2019 issue |
|
Authors' & Writers' Corner |
|
| Facing the music with hostile bowling | |
![]() |
|
| Bernard Heydorn | |
Cricket is no longer a gentleman’s game. Bouncers in the form of fast-rising, short pitched balls have poisoned the game. It is perhaps the only sport where a player can cause harm to an opponent on a regular basis and get away with it. The current test series (the Ashes) of England versus Australia is a good example of this. The International Cricket Council (ICC) states that it is unlikely that the rule on the bowling of bouncers will be tightened, despite the tragic death of Phillip Hughes, the Australian batsman who died in 2014, in a state match in that country. As the rule stands, bowlers are allowed two bouncers per over in Tests and one day Internationals, and one per over in Twenty/20 Internationals. In spite of that, in watching England playing against Australia recently, at a Test Match at Lords, I saw a spate of bouncers being bowled, some at over 90 miles per hour, by the English fast bowler Archer. One of those bouncers laid low Steve Smith, the Australian batsman, considered the best batsman in the world. He suffered a concussion which affected the course of the game. Archer was seemingly encouraged by his team mates and the English supporters to deliver some more. Smith was lucky to make a recovery. The umpires seem to be either lax or blind or both. This is no longer sport – a contest between bat and ball. All sports involve rules. Some sports are more dangerous than others. Physical injury cannot be ruled out. But deliberate attempts to intimidate, physically and psychologically, are out of bounds in my books. It should be a crime and not disguised as sport. Some argue that the modern batsman has improved batting gear to protect him – gloves, helmets with visors and neck guards, pads and body protection. Players can get struck in the heart. Even some umpires and in-fielders are getting protection these days from a fast flying ball coming their way on the field. Cricket spectators however like to see the drama, the fast ball, the batsman ducking around to avoid injury. It is like a brutal boxing match with the opponent’s hands tied or a bull fight (which I have seen in Spain) where the bull does not stand a chance. The one-sided contest is a no contest. The batsman is supposed to defend himself with the bat or hook the ball away. Try hooking a ball coming at you at a speed that you can hardly see. I have played cricket against fast bowlers and the sound of the ball whistling past your body is not a pleasant one. I got one such bouncer in my forehead in practice at St. Stanislaus College in Guyana when I was 16 years old, which sent me to the emergency of St. Joseph’s Hospital, and a testing for concussion. It is true that some wickets may be bad or can deteoriate, such as at St. Stanislaus, and help to produce bouncers, and not necessarily the bowlers intention. Bodyline bowling (bouncers) in the 1930’s almost caused a war between two countries – England and Australia. The English reportedly wanted to get rid of Don Bradman, the Australian who was the best batsman in the world at that time. The English introduced two fast bowlers (Larwood and Voce) to do the job with bouncers called “bodyline bowling”. Of course Australia retaliated with fast bowlers of their own. Since then, just about every cricketing country including the West Indies have used fast bowlers as a weapon in their cricket armoury. Not the least of these was the Jamaican Roy Gilchrist who went a step further by sending “beamers” directly at the batsman’s head. He was sent home after a short while for such actions by the West Indian captain. Incidentally, my wife and I met Roy Gilchrist in the 1970’s at a nightclub in Lancashire, England. He was playing cricket then in the Lancashire league. He was very aimiable and we even discussed his unusually long arms which he admitted helped him to bowl faster. Fast bowlers “hunted” in pairs in Test cricket – Hall and Griffith (West Indies), Statham and Truman (England), the latter causing Rohan Kanhai, the Guyanese batsman so much blows that he complained to Clyde Walcott, his captain batting at the other end, wondering out loud, “What Truman had against him?” At that time, the batsman had only gloves and pads to protect him – no head gear. Other famous fast bowlers included the Australians, Lindwall and Miller I have been fortunate to see a number of these famous fast bowers in action and I can tell you, the tension in the grounds is such that you can hear a pin drop among tens of thousands of spectators. At times a vendor would shout “Doubles! Drinks! Who want meh?” which would ease the suspense and provide some comic relief. On a personal note, the most hostile fast bowling I faced was at the Mental Hospital Grounds in Barbados – staff versus patients. I played there once as an opening batsman, on the side of staff - in case you were wondering (smile). The opening bowler sent down the first ball which I did not see but heard it hit the boundary fence behind me! The second ball took my bat away. He was getting closer. The third one hit me on my skimpy gloves and flew to the slips where it was grabbed by one of the patients in a lightning move. I walked off with the help of the Psychiatrist Superintendent of the Hospital who apologized for “the enthusiasm of the patients for the game of cricket”. My fingers were swollen and numb for days. I will do my bit for cricket but not in those circumstances again. Bumpers may be around for a while yet and outlive me. Perhaps the over-hostile fast bowler should be instantly removed from the game, suffer a penalty, financial and otherwise, or even banned from the game, as happens in other sports for transgressions less dangerous than bouncing. Let us play the game the ladies do with decorum and decency. If the creeks don’t rise and the sun still shines I’ll be talking to you. |
|
| Guyanese-born Walrond’s ‘blistering imagination’ |
|
![]() |
|
| Eric Derwent Walrond | |
By Romeo Kaseram Eric Derwent Walrond was born in Georgetown, then British Guiana, on December 18, 1896, to a Guyanese father, and Barbadian mother, Ruth. He left BG early in life, and as Wikipedia and Oxford Reference indicate, moved with his mother only when he was eight years old to live with relatives in Barbados, where his education began at St Stephen’s Boys’ School. Then yet another upheaval, this time to the construction zone at the Panama Canal in 1911, where he studied at public schools in Colón, Panama. It was here where he completed his early studies; understandably, he also acquired fluency in Spanish, Wikipedia tells us. Sources for this exploration: Wikipedia; Encylopaedia Britannica; Oxford Reference; and blackpast.org |
|
| < Community Connection | |